City Pedia Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. NikeTalk - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NikeTalk

    NikeTalk. NikeTalk is an Internet forum for the discussion of sneakers and sneaker collecting. This website was started by Nelson Cabral, from Montreal in Canada on December 10, 1999. Since then Niketalk has evolved past just talking about shoes, and now is a place for discussion about sports, the media, music, video games, and the news.

  3. List of fake news websites - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fake_news_websites

    The man behind one of America's biggest 'fake news' websites is a former BBC worker from London whose mother writes many of his stories. Sean Adl-Tabatabai, 35, runs YourNewsWire.com, the source of scores of dubious news stories, including claims that the Queen had threatened to abdicate if the UK voted against Brexit.

  4. Fake news websites in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fake_news_websites_in_the...

    Fake news websites target United States audiences by using disinformation to create or inflame controversial topics such as the 2016 election. Most fake news websites target readers by impersonating or pretending to be real news organizations, which can lead to legitimate news organizations further spreading their message.

  5. Identify legitimate AOL websites, requests, and communications

    help.aol.com/articles/identify-legitimate-aol...

    Identify legitimate AOL websites, requests, and communications. Scammers and bad actors are always looking for ways to get personal info with malicious intent. Know how to recognize legitimate AOL websites, requests, and communications to keep your account secure.

  6. FactCheck.org - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FactCheck.org

    Launched. December 2003; 20 years ago. ( 2003-12) FactCheck.org is a nonprofit [1] website that aims to reduce the level of deception and confusion in U.S. politics by providing original research on misinformation and hoaxes. [2] It is a project of the Annenberg Public Policy Center of the Annenberg School for Communication at the University of ...

  7. List of fact-checking websites - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fact-checking_websites

    The Reporters' Lab at Duke University maintains a database of fact-checking organizations that is managed by Mark Stencel and Bill Adair. The database tracks more than 100 non-partisan organizations around the world. The Lab's inclusion criteria are based on whether the organization. examines all parties and sides;

  8. Fake news website - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fake_news_website

    Common characteristics of fake news websites, as noted by many fact-checkers and journalists, are sorted into several categories: Source credibility Impostor sites that appear to be legitimate news sites, newspapers, television stations or radio stations, often using spoofed URLs or imitating the layout and graphics of established news sites.

  9. List of satirical fake news websites - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_satirical_fake...

    Spread hoaxes since February 2016, including the false claim of a late-night motorcycle curfew. [9] [10] [8] Baltimore Gazette. baltimoregazette.com. Unrelated to Baltimore Gazette, a 19th-century newspaper. Possibly part of same network as Associated Media Coverage, another fake news site. [9] [11] Blog.VeteranTV.net.

  10. List of social networking services - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_social_networking...

    List of social networking services. A social networking service is an online platform that people use to build social networks or social relationships with other people who share similar personal or career interests, activities, backgrounds or real-life connections. This is a list of notable active social network services, excluding online ...

  11. Media Bias/Fact Check - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Media_Bias/Fact_Check

    Media Bias/Fact Check ( MBFC) is an American website founded in 2015 by Dave M. Van Zandt. [1] It considers four main categories and multiple subcategories in assessing the "political bias" and "factual reporting" of media outlets. [2] [3] It is widely used, but has been criticized for its methodology. [4]